On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, at 16:23, Peter Haag wrote: > | > are there others who would find that useful, or do i have some > | > perverse uses ? > | > | i feel very alone - perhaps my uses of profiles are perverse after > | all ... > > Well ... :)
being perverse is hardly a surprise - what surprises me is to be the only one having such a perversion :) as a use case - i do have profiles / channels to track network use of long and boring lists of subnets. being able to put the main filter at the profile level and having channels for a subset of said traffic (say, some popular ports) would be convenient. But that's ok - if nobody has such uses, i can keep the list sync'd for every channel concerned ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Nfsen-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
