I'm using
[root@hail ~]# nfdump -V
nfdump: Version: 1.6.1 $LastChangedDate: 2010-03-05 07:50:35 +0100 (Fri, 05
Mar 2010) $
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Tiago Flôres <[email protected]>wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Please tell me which version of nfdump and nfsen are you referring to?
>
> Unfortunately because an incompatibility between latest nfsen/nfdump
> and latest rrdtool 1.4.x (in RHEL 5), I have to use nfsen 1.3.2 with
> nfdump 1.5.8 and older rrdtool 1.2.x :(
>
> I got "Filter error: line 1: syntax error at 'router'!", with simple
> syntax "router ip 172.0.0.1"
>
> This feature should have been implemented in newer versions. I'll
> think about another way to work around.
>
> Thank you anyway!
>
> Tiago
>
>
>
> 2012/3/7 Adrian Popa <[email protected]>:
> > Sure it is.
> >
> > man nfdump:
> >
> > Router IP
> > router ip <ipaddr>
> > Filter the flows according the IP address of the exporting
> > router.
> >
> > Also, you can export to different ports and have multiple entries in
> nfsen
> > (each router exports to a different UDP port) and you won't need
> filtering
> > by router ip.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Tiago Flôres <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I am not aware of this "router ip" syntax. This is very useful expr
> >> but it doesn't exist in the manuals?!?!
> >>
> >> Thanks all of you for the answers!
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Tiago
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/3/7 Adrian Popa <[email protected]>:
> >> > Also, you can edit your filters to take into account the exporter
> router
> >> > ip
> >> > and input/output interface indexes when you count traffic for a
> prefix.
> >> > Something like
> >> >
> >> > router ip ip_of_router1 and in if snmp_index_of_input_interface and
> src
> >> > ip
> >> > 1.2.3.4 and dst net 5.6.7.0/24
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Tiago Flôres <
> [email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Dear colleagues
> >> >>
> >> >> I have eight routers exporting flow to one source (I am not sure if
> it
> >> >> is the best scenario) or should I have each router exporting flow to
> >> >> own source (router1 -> source1, router2 -> source2, ...). One of
> these
> >> >> routers is a mpls concentrator and the others seven are peers, like
> >> >> clients. The concentrator is where the servers are installed. The
> >> >> network traffic are mostly destinated to the main site (router1)
> which
> >> >> has 34Mbps mpls bandwidth.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am using DST NET and SRC NET to classify the traffic for down and
> >> >> upload directions. The thing is I've been getting discrepancies in
> >> >> traffic graphs. The main site where I've 34Mbps 'physically limited'
> >> >> is showing me up to 90 Mbps in nfsen graphs.
> >> >>
> >> >> Remembering that I have eight routers exporting to one source. In
> this
> >> >> among of flows I am trying to analyze and identify the traffic which
> >> >> goes to router1, but the traffic graphed is much more than the
> >> >> interface is able to support.
> >> >>
> >> >> The flows are from all interfaces of all routers? LAN and WAN?
> >> >>
> >> >> By default nfsen aggregates identical network traffic? Or could the
> >> >> flows are not been aggregated?
> >> >>
> >> >> I am guessing around .... the same traffic which ingress in router1
> >> >> WAN is arriving in router1 LAN interface, what about it?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in advance for any explanations
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hugs
> >> >>
> >> >> Tiago
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> >> >> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft
> developers
> >> >> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3,
> >> >> MVC3,
> >> >> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Nfsen-discuss mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> >> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> >> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nfsen-discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Nfsen-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Nfsen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss