Glad to hear you sorted it out! What does -B stand for (I haven't used
fprobe)? UDP buffer?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Leandro <[email protected]> wrote:

> Adrian, finally I got it working properly.
> Reading the man page for fprobe I founded the following:
>
>         Reasonable configuration to run under heavy load:
>         fprobe -fip -B4096 -r2 -q10000 -t10000:10000000 localhost:2055
>
> After applying the B , r and q parameters I got the complete traffic shape.
> Also at fprobe server , any performance parameter showed some increment so
> I think it is working
>
> Thanks for your advice.
> Leandro.
>
>
> On 05/12/15 04:28, Adrian Popa wrote:
>
> Hmm, if the source machine doesn't have enough resources to export the
> flows, you should see things like - a core being used 100% by fprobe or udp
> packets being dropped because of too small buffers in the output of netstat
> -s (check on both source and destination). You could use iptables to count
> packets leaving the source vs packets arriving at the destination to rule
> out network drops in between with something like
> iptables -A OUTPUT -m udp --dport 9995 -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A INPUT -m udp --dport 9995 -j ACCEPT
> And check stats with
> iptables -l -n -v
>
> But it's difficult to troubleshoot...
> On 4 Dec 2015 15:09, "Leandro" < <[email protected]>[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Adrian , thanks for your response.
>> About sampling ... Im not sure what is it but im running the fprobe just
>> with the line:
>>
>> /usr/local/sbin/fprobe -i eth3 -fip -n7 172.24.3.12:9995
>>
>> Which in a case o a traffic bellow than 1gbps works great.
>> In my case the message you are describing "Sequence errors or bad packets"
>> Apears many times in the collector log file, so there is some problem
>> ,but;
>> How can I confirm if the problem is on the nfcapd or the fprobe side ?
>> Can I modify on  something on any side to properly export more than 1.4Gbps
>> ?
>> Both machine where they are running are very powerfull machines.
>>
>> I can provide more info
>> Thanks in advance!!!
>> Leo.
>>
>>
>> On 04/12/15 04:37, Adrian Popa wrote:
>>
>> If you're using sampling you should see differences between netflow
>> traffic and real traffic. If not, check that:
>>
>> 1. you're not losing UDP packets - if you lose packets you should see
>> something like this:
>> Dec  4 09:35:00 localhost nfcapd[13268]: Ident: 'MyRouter' Flows: 11763,
>> Packets: 930064, Bytes: 731126982, Sequence Errors: 0, Bad Packets: 0
>>
>> Sequence errors or bad packets will indicate something's wrong on the
>> network side.
>>
>> 2. your router has enough capacity (TCAM memory) to export all the flows
>> If you get errors in your router's log that TCAM memory is nearly
>> exhausted, then the router will stop producing flows for a while and you
>> get those drops at higher traffic.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Leandro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi , guys.
>>> It is very strange but , my nfsen is showing a maximun traffic value of
>>> 1.2 gbps when the traffic showed on cacti is 2gbps(also meassured on the
>>> router).
>>> Traffic shape is ok , minimun values mathes on both tools.
>>> Any ideas about it ? Is there something to tune on fprobe, nfcapd or
>>> nfsen ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Leandro.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
>>> Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
>>> Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
>>> Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple
>>> OSs.
>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nfsen-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nfsen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfsen-discuss

Reply via email to