Hello! On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:10:18PM +0400, Roman Arutyunyan wrote:
[...] > Another issue i’ve found reading the RFC. > > If the reason for $upstream_cache_age is adding HTTP Age response header then > it makes > sense to improve age calculation algorithm. > > According to RFC 7234 / 4.2.3. "Calculating Age” the local cache age should > be added > to the Age value received from backend (“age_value"). > > response_delay = response_time - request_time; > corrected_age_value = age_value + response_delay; I agree, I don't think that the "date" value as stored in the cache can/should be used for Age header. And I doubt it should be exposed as a variable at all, even if calculated properly. -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/ _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
