Hello! On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 02:06:53PM +0300, Valentin V. Bartenev wrote:
> If somebody wants nginx to support trailers then why not, > as long as this feature is optional. The problem is that every feature implies additional complexity and support costs. Moreover, in case of trailers - certainly additional security concerns. Just adding all possible features won't work, as you will end up with a huge and bloated piece of junk. And that's why I asking for real-world use cases to make sure features added are in fact needed and benefits from features added outwheigh support costs. In case of trailers, there is additional argument of trailers being [mostly] unused for almost twenty years since introduction in HTTP/1.1. You may also find interesting this comment in the thread previously linked here: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/34#issuecomment-122377633 -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/ _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
