Hello! On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:17:36AM -0800, Thibault Charbonnier wrote:
> On 1/31/17 8:00 AM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > You may want to provide more details on what problem you are > > trying to solve. > > The use-case was originally to use a longer proxy_read_timeout on > certain upstream locations without duplicating too much configuration > (our location block). I then thought it would be nice to have for other > timeout directives as well, and eventually reuse the code in other > modules as you suggested, so timeout directives could support variables > anywhere. Clear enough, thank you. Using an additional location might be a better solution, at least until there is a way to introduce variables support with less effort. -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/ _______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
