2013/3/14 Pasi Kärkkäinen <[email protected]> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:12:47PM +0400, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Hello, > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:36:23PM +0000, André Cruz wrote: > > > > > I'm also very interested in being able to configure nginx to NOT > > > proxy the entire request. > > > > > > Regarding this patch, > > > https://github.com/alibaba/tengine/pull/91, is anything > > > fundamentally wrong with it? I don't understand Chinese so I'm > > > at a loss here... > > > > As a non-default mode of operation the aproach taken is likely > > good enough (not looked into details), but the patch won't work > > with current nginx versions - at least it needs (likely major) > > adjustments to cope with changes introduced during work on chunked > > request body support as available in nginx 1.3.9+. > > > > Weibin: Have you thought of upstreaming the no_buffer patch to nginx 1.3.x > so it could become part of next nginx stable version 1.4 ? > You can see my first email in this thread, The nginx team are working on it. But I don't know when they finish it. You can wait for their version.
Thanks. > > It'd be really nice to have the no_buffer functionality in stock nginx! > (the current no_buffer_v5.patch seems to work OK for me on nginx 1.2.7) > > -- Pasi > > > -- > > Maxim Dounin > > http://nginx.org/en/donation.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > nginx mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx > -- Weibin Yao Developer @ Server Platform Team of Taobao
_______________________________________________ nginx mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
