Hello! On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:34:20PM -0400, ddutra wrote:
[...] > Scenario three - The same page, saved as .html and server by nginx > > Transactions: 1799 hits > Availability: 100.00 % > Elapsed time: 120.00 secs > Data transferred: 25.33 MB > Response time: 2.65 secs > Transaction rate: 14.99 trans/sec > Throughput: 0.21 MB/sec > Concurrency: 39.66 > Successful transactions: 1799 > Failed transactions: 0 > Longest transaction: 5.21 > Shortest transaction: 1.30 > > > Here is the main question. This is a huge difference. I mean, AFAIK serving > from cache is supposed to be as fast as serving a static .html file, right? > I mean - nginx sees that there is a cache rule for location and sees that > there is a cached version, serves it. Why so much difference? The 15 requests per second for a static file looks utterly slow, and first of all you may want to find out what's a limiting factor in this case. This will likely help to answer the question "why the difference". >From what was previously reported here - communication with EC2 via external ip address may be very slow, and using 127.0.0.1 instead used to help. -- Maxim Dounin http://nginx.org/en/donation.html _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
