Hello!
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:22:25AM +0000, Paul Taylor wrote:
> Yup, again, you’re right! I’ve moved the config around, so that I’m testing
> for any ‘true’ value in the proxy_no_cache & proxy_bypass_cache directives
> (removing the existing set_by_lua block).
>
> However, it’s still not behaving as I’d expect.
>
> In the following scenario (note comments):
>
> map $upstream_http_x_no_cache $no_cache_header {
> "" 0;
> default 1;
> }
>
> proxy_cache_bypass $no_cache_dirs $logged_in; # $no_cache_header;
> proxy_no_cache $no_cache_dirs $logged_in; # $no_cache_header;
>
> X-Cache-Status value is MISS, which is correct. Output of $no_cache_header is
> 1 (as set in the map).
>
> However, when adding back in the compare on $no_cache_header:
>
> proxy_cache_bypass $no_cache_dirs $logged_in $no_cache_header;
> proxy_no_cache $no_cache_dirs $logged_in $no_cache_header;
>
> X-Cache-Status value is still MISS, which is not correct, as it should be
> BYPASS. Output of $no_cache_header is 0.
>
> Unless I’m missing something, it still looks like touching the variable kills
> it?
The proxy_cache_bypass directive is expected to be checked before
a request is sent to a backend - it is to control whether a
request will be served from a cache or passed to a backend.
That is, what you see is actually expected behaviour - there are
no reasons X-Cache-Status to be BYPASS, and the cached
$no_cache_header value to be different from 0.
--
Maxim Dounin
http://nginx.org/
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
