On 9/01/2014 11:47 PM, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
On 9 January 2014 12:24, nano <nano...@bsdbox.co> wrote:
I share your opinion regarding nginx documentation. It is woeful.
Sorry chap - I didn't say that and I don't think that. There may well
be some specific target audiences not well served by the aggregate of
the current (psuedo-)documentation sources, but that doesn't mean they
themselves are /that/ bad. My problems with them are specific and
fixable, and not just "make it better!"
J
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
Nonetheless, I find the official documentation lacking. It is good that
you do not. Fortunately, there are alternative resources that make
deployment of nginx servers achievable for users lacking technical
proficiency, like myself.
--
syn.bsdbox.co
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
nginx@nginx.org
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
