Hi Zenny,
On 20/12/15 17:08, Zenny wrote:
On 12/20/15, Valentin V. Bartenev <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sunday 20 December 2015 10:44:03 Zenny wrote:
Hi,
Just reading the following two documents and the first link refers to
the some of the nginx features.
https://mistserver.org/comparison
https://mistserver.org/guides/ProFeatures_2.4.pdf
But there are stuffs which I think are incorrect like recording option
which nginx_rtmp module already has
(https://github.com/arut/nginx-rtmp-module/wiki/Directives#record) but
the first document states it does not have!
Can you add more to this thread which the first document claims "does
not have in nginx", but otherwise?
[..]
It's worth to add nginx plus to the comparison, since it has enchantments
in this area.
See:
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_f4f_module.html
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_hls_module.html
http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_mp4_module.html#mp4_limit_rate
Thanks Valentin. It would be nicer if you can specify which feature of
the mistserver (in the mistserver comparison list) are replaced by
above.
Expecting more inputs flowing in!
I'm not an expert on our RTMP module but here are a few things I quickly
found:
* Live transcoding is possible using ffmpeg (as in our documented examples)
* I'm not quite sure what is meant by multi-protocol DVR here. But
through ffmpeg multiple protocols are supported.
* As mentioned, live recording is supported
* Stdin is a bad comparison. Web servers shouldn't take data via stdin.
* MPEG-DASH is supported
* "Progressive FLV Streaming" is an oxymoron. You are either doing
progressive downloading or streaming.
It looks like the comparison is rather old and open to interpretation.
It is very much an apples to oranges comparison.
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings (LinuxJedi)
Technical Product Manager, NGINX Inc.
_______________________________________________
nginx mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
