Right now, we're just building NH trunk. If you want another branch
added (e.g 2.1 stabilization), just ask.

BTW - Right now we're just running the "build" target, not test. I
want to get tests running with NH and others that do not have it. I'll
let you know if I need any script changes to make it compatible with
TC.

James

On Feb 25, 8:11 am, Davy Brion <[email protected]> wrote:
> i agree, i think it's a great effort on their part and we would be stupid
> not to make use of it.
>
> i will finish up the msbuild script when i have more time to do it, should
> be in the middle of next week somewhere... after that i'll start fixing as
> many NH-core issues as i have time for :)
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You can manage your priorities... this is OSS ;)IMO the msBuild task
> > should be done when you have time to do it, what is sure is that now we can
> > use the teamcity.codebetter buildserver instead our own.
>
> > The teamcity.codebetter buildserver has another BIG very BIG power : create
> > a real continuous integration between trunks of various projects. (NH with
> > FNH and Castle.NH.Facilities, or Castle.DynamicProxy2
> > with NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle and so on).
> > We should work together with them, supporting their effort (IMO).
>
> > 2009/2/25 Davy Brion <[email protected]>
>
> > yeah i saw that this morning... the question is: do we still need our own
> >> buildserver and the msbuild script now that the codebetter guys have 
> >> already
> >> set one up?  I haven't had time to work on the msbuild script recently, and
> >> probably won't have time to resume that work until next week.
>
> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>> Davy, in your work about NAnt and MsBuild take care on requirements of
> >>>http://teamcity.codebetter.com(db creation) thanks.
> >>> Thanks to James, JetBrains, CodeBetter, IdeaVine, and Devlicio.us
> >>>http://www.jameskovacs.com/blog/AnnouncingTeamCityCodeBettercom.aspx
>
> >>> --
> >>> Fabio Maulo
>
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to