Torkel...
If NH-2011 was marked with "resolved" is because it has a test and a patch
to pass the test.
What solves the new patch?

A new issue or exactly the same ?
If is for exactly the same issue why we should have 2 patchs ?

2010/1/5 Torkel Ödegaard <[email protected]>

> Ahh, sorry I linked to the wrong issue :)
>
> I did attach the patch to the correct issue though :)
>
> http://nhjira.koah.net/browse/NH-2011
>
> On Jan 5, 1:20 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I don't understand.
> > NH-2009 is open.
> > NH-2011 is resolved because it pass the test you have sent.
> >
> > The patch you have sent here is for NH-2009, for NH-2011 or is for
> another
> > issue ?
> > If the issue is not exactly the same of NH-2011 please open a new one.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 2010/1/5 Torkel Ödegaard <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Yes, will do, sorry :)
> >
> > > The issue was closed so was afraid that a new patch would not be
> > > noticed.
> >
> > > The issue now contains the new patch.
> > >http://nhjira.koah.net/browse/NH-2009
> >
> > > Cheers
> > > Torkel
> >
> > > On Jan 5, 6:27 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Please don't use the dev-list for these things; please attach the
> patch
> > > > directly to your issue.
> > > > Thanks.
> >
> > > > 2010/1/4 Torkel Ödegaard <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > > Hi,
> >
> > > > > I discovered a little problem with my patch for issue NH 2011, it
> > > occurs
> > > > > when merging a transient entity with a null component.
> >
> > > > > I have attached a patch fix.
> >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Torkel
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Fabio Maulo
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to