Please, I'm needing feed-back coming from code-review.

Try to think at it as a possible mapping-by-code solution for NH3.0.
I'm seriously thinking to add it in NH directly.

2010/1/13 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>

> Hi team.
>
> I would like to have a code re-view of my last post and
> a constructive feedback
> http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/01/map-nhibernate-using-your-api.html
>
> <http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/01/map-nhibernate-using-your-api.html>The
> post, and overall the code, is basically an example about how implement a
> custom API to create mappings by code.
> That is an invitation to everybody want create his own API and even an
> invitation for FNH team to use the Hbm* classes instead generate XML.
>
> That said, seeing how things are going in each framework, NH needs its own
> mapping-by-code.
> Two matters here:
> 1) API definition
> 2) usage of Hbm* or directly create metadata (classes of namespace
> NHibernate.Mapping)
>
> What is clear is that our implementation will supports anything supported
> by XML and, probably, we will improve some of actual
> "conventions-interceptors" (as, for instance, INamingStrategy & Co. ).
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to