+1
I like the idea of having this out-the-box, and available for use in tests
too.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "sbohlen" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 2:22 PM
To: "nhibernate-development" <[email protected]>
Subject: [nhibernate-development] Re: Mapping by code
As nobody provided any realistic reason *not* to proceed as generally
outlined, I suggest this proceed as planned taking into account the
comments/suggestions made here (with the possible exception of the
tangential thread about "make sure this works in VB.NET" ;)
-Steve B.
On Feb 6, 8:39 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all.
I'm going to begin the implementation of "Loquacious mapping" in the
trunk.
- API proposed in my blog (generics and strongly typed)
- *Mapper implementation as studied in ConfORM (namespaces ConfOrm.NH
and ConfOrm.Mappers ), neither generic nor strongly typed.
Thoughts ?
2010/1/13 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
> Hi team.
> I would like to have a code re-view of my last post and
> a constructive feedback
>http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/01/map-nhibernate-using-your-api....
> <http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/01/map-nhibernate-using-your-api....>The
> post, and overall the code, is basically an example about how implement
> a
> custom API to create mappings by code.
> That is an invitation to everybody want create his own API and even an
> invitation for FNH team to use the Hbm* classes instead generate XML.
> That said, seeing how things are going in each framework, NH needs its
> own
> mapping-by-code.
> Two matters here:
> 1) API definition
> 2) usage of Hbm* or directly create metadata (classes of namespace
> NHibernate.Mapping)
> What is clear is that our implementation will supports anything
> supported
> by XML and, probably, we will improve some of actual
> "conventions-interceptors" (as, for instance, INamingStrategy & Co. ).
> --
> Fabio Maulo
--
Fabio Maulo
