Thanks Diego (at least somebody saw the extensibility). Have fun!
2010/4/6 Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> > All, > > I'm happy to present a new mini-project to the NH world: *ConfOrmContrib*( > http://code.google.com/p/conformcontrib/). > > *What is it?* > A collection of addins for ConfORM > > *Why?* > Because I want to help ConfORM succeed. > > *Why?* > Because it rocks > > *So, you're creating addins for a tool that hasn't even been released, > that is itself an addin to another library?* > Yes. > > *Why?* > Because it's fun. > > *Why not just contribute patches to ConfORM?* > I will keep doing that. So far, Fabio has been really open to my > suggestions and has implemented most of my patches, after fixing them. > I've also learned a lot from reading his code and especially his > corrections. That will not change. > > *So...?* > I'd like to be able to manage the cycle myself, without bothering Fabio, > when changes to the core are not required. > And I want to include as many patterns as possible, in particular those > that help map legacy or DBA-defined schemas. > And I want to use Mercurial in an OSS project. > And did I mention it's fun? > > *Sounds interesting. How can I contribute?* > You can send me your own addins and patches. Once we include at least one > in the project, you can get commit access. > My idea is to make this as open as possible. > > *What about upstream collaboration?* > I keep a close eye on ConfORM progress. > Whenever a piece of ConfOrmContrib is included in ConfORM, or becomes > redundant with an equivalente feature, it will be deprecated and then > removed to avoid duplication. > > Diego > -- Fabio Maulo -- To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
