Is there a build server that runs the various unit tests? Who manages the SQL server and where is it?
John Davidson On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:46 PM, vadim <[email protected]> wrote: > There won't be many forks to merge to svn. Core team members will pull > from contributors and push to the "official" repo, so single > repository will be authoritative source. That's the url which home > page should point to. > > But the question remains: will somebody want to replicate changes back > to svn repo? > In my opinion there is no sense of doing so. If testing goes well and > you guys decide on Hg vs Git, there should be announced a cut-off > date, after which svn is closed. > > Vadim. > > On Jun 16, 4:35 am, Julian <[email protected]> wrote: > > I meant... > > Forking is easy. I was more worried about merging the many forks > > (contributions on Bitbucket and Github) into the trunk on SF SVN. Or > > is this not an issue? > > > > On Jun 16, 7:27 pm, Julian Maughan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Forking is easy. I was more worried about merging the may forks from > > > Bitbucket and Github intoth > > > > > On 16 Jun 2010 17:25, "Richard Birkby" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The point of DVCS's is to fork. There are 1007 forks of Ruby on Rails > on > > > Github. > > > I don't think anyone is going to misunderstand that. > > > > > Richard > > > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Julian <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > I personally don't t... >
