Yeah, clearly should be handled sim. to the way NHContrib, etc. projects are tracked/categorized in their own 'sandboxes' so-to-speak.
Steve Bohlen [email protected] http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com http://twitter.com/sbohlen On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Richard Brown (gmail) < [email protected]> wrote: > No problem here either ... as long as there's a setting in the > 'Component' field (or a separate project in JIRA) for it. > > > *From:* Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, August 29, 2010 2:38 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [nhibernate-development] JIRA ConfOrm > > Seems reasonable, but wouldn't an adopter be more likely to look at the > 'issues' list on the Google Code site --? (e.g., does this violate the > principle of least-surprise?) > > Steve Bohlen > [email protected] > http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com > http://twitter.com/sbohlen > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Wind-Team! >> >> Can I use our JIRA for ConfORM issues ? >> >> -- >> Fabio Wind Maulo >> >> >
