FYI,
No comments in 48hs mean: go ahead with the plan.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Julian <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've been having some email correspondence with Glenn Paulley (see his
> blog at http://iablog.sybase.com/paulley/) regarding the state of
> Sybase dialects in NHibernate. This was in response to a couple of
> JIRA issues (http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-1894 and
> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2068).
>
> The current dialects are:
>
> 1) For Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) [current version is
> 15.5]:
>
> - public class SybaseDialect : Dialect
> - public class Sybase11Dialect : SybaseDialect
> - public class SybaseAdoNet12Dialect : Dialect
>
> 2) For Sybase SQL Anywhere [current version is 12]:
>
> - public class SybaseAnywhereDialect : Dialect
> - public class SybaseASA9Dialect : SybaseAnywhereDialect
> - public class SybaseASA10Dialect : SybaseASA9Dialect
>
> As you can see from this list, the naming is all over the place and we
> don't have dialects for current versions. More importantly Glenn has
> noted a number of omissions and inaccuracies.
>
> Fabio and I favour removing all the current dialects, and replacing
> them with correctly named, and better implemented versions. For SQL
> Anywhere this shouldn't be a problem as Glenn has already contributed
> dialects covering versions 10/11 and will soon provide one for version
> 12. He has indicated these dialects address many of the deficiencies
> in the current NH dialects, and are being used in Production by a
> couple of his clients.
>
> Without similar contributions for Sybase ASE we could end up without
> any dialects for this product. I did notice that Hibernate has
> dialects which seem to be more actively updated than ours, including
> one for ASE version 15, which we could port. As for testing...
>
> Please note that I'm not a user of these database products, and don't
> have them available for testing; so I've been relying on Glenn's
> invaluable contributions and advice. The purpose of this post was
> really just to bring this discussion into the open, and hopefully get
> some feedback.
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to