inline On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Oh! you're right, I forgot about that one, indeed. AGPL (A stands > for aggressive? ;)) was the insane one. > > The A is for Affero, and it is useful for a limited set of scenarios, like RavenDB :-) > I still find it odd that to this day, the linking clause hasn't been > widely disputed as stupid. For exmple the DbProviderFactory system in .NET: > you never link to the ado.net provider, in memory the .net provider > factory > system links to it... violation? Judges really won't understand that, most > of them can barely handle modern things like keyboards and mice. ;) > *snort* Oh, absolutely. More to the point, what happen when the link is not only at runtime, but also provided courtesy of the user itself. That is big enough headache... > > > > Actually, that scenario is safe. You aren't distributing your changes. > > if you create the website for a client, you do. Many consultants > don't get this, but creating software for a 3rd party IS distribution. Only > if the creator himself uses the work it's not distribution. > No, it isn't. I created the website on behalf of the customer. I am not distributing it, because the customer has ownership on the code.
