Yeah -- I used to do that as well, until I ran into incompatibility issues
with diff vers of NANT on multiple diff OSS projects all on my same PC that
took me *forever* to troubleshoot my way through.  Now no more 'ubiquitous'
NANT in my path :)

YMMV in all cases, of course so stick with what works~!

Steve Bohlen
[email protected]
http://blog.unhandled-exceptions.com
http://twitter.com/sbohlen


On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Valeriu Caraulean <[email protected]>wrote:

> It should work this way too, haven't checked...
> For me it's just more comfortable having it in the path and don't bother
> taping paths.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Stephen Bohlen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't believe that's actually true. If you invoke nant via an explicit
>> path (e.g. C:\myStuff\Nant.exe) but your currect active dir is the same as
>> contains the build file(s) it should still work without having NAnt on your
>> path.
>>
>> This is how I run the NH NAnt scripts all the time. Does this not work for
>> you --?
>>
>>
>> -Steve B.
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: * Valeriu Caraulean <[email protected]>
>> *Sender: * [email protected]
>> *Date: *Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:19:38 +0200
>> *To: *<[email protected]>
>> *ReplyTo: * [email protected]
>> *Subject: *Re: [nhibernate-development] Missing AssemblyInfo file?
>>
>> Yes, you need NAnt to be installed and registered in your path.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Graham Bunce 
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start contributing some patches for NH so got the latest
>>> code from trunk through my SVN client. When I opened the source code
>>> in VS2008 and tried to build I noticed the AssemblyInfo.cs files are
>>> missing i.e. they are not in SVN.
>>>
>>> I can just go ahead and create dummy versions on my disk to get round
>>> this, but should I not be building in this way - do I have to use the
>>> NANT scripts? Do these create the AssemblyInfo files in your TeamCity
>>> build process?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to