ok

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:

> Why not?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Can we give support even for System.Uri ?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Or you may think that .Net3.5 mean .Net3.5 and then discover that there
>>> is a .Net3.5 but... "Client Profile"where something was removed.
>>> In general each dependency is a PITA internal to .NET framework or
>>> external it is a PITA... the internals to the .NET framework are a PITA a
>>> little bit small but a PITA.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well... you may have a dependency to mscorelib and then discover that
>>>> there is another mscorelib where something is missed.
>>>> O no?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Rory Plaire <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> System.Xml.Linq is in .Net v3.5 and .Net v4.0 Client and above. Taking
>>>>> a dependency should pose no problem if .Net 3.5 is required.
>>>>>
>>>>> The difference between a dependency on a subpart of the framework and
>>>>> the framework as a whole seems to me to be nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> -r
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Pablo Ruiz <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If the fix is trivial.. I would avoid referencing Sys.Xml.Linq.. Maybe
>>>>>> as an external IUserType or as part of NhuAddIns?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2342
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  <http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2342>Opinions about the
>>>>>>> introduction of a dependency to System.Xml.Linq ?
>>>>>>> The fix is trivial but I would avoid another dependency even if it is
>>>>>>> part of ".Net" framework (which one of the .Net frameworks only God and
>>>>>>> Microsoft know)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabio Maulo
>>
>>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to