I should have time to review your Linq patches this week...

On Nov 21, 1:33 am, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> While I'm thankful for all the work that was put into the Linq
> provider for this release, I'm rather disappointed in how the beta
> cycle has gone.  We're facing release, and there are still many very
> important issues that haven't even been commented on in the Linq
> area.  To give you some idea, in the entire beta period for the large
> chunk of code that the Linq provider is, only 4 issues have been
> resolved.  During that same period, 25 new issues were created with
> virtually no activity on them.  To give you some idea of what I'm
> talking about, here's a sampling of the issues.
>
> Numerous people have filed and voted about parameters not having the
> correct type:
> NH-2222
> NH-2234
> NH-2244
> NH-2394
> A patch is available in NH-2394, without a single pertinent comment.
>
> The null handling is another area with clear problems.  You likely
> remember the long messages on the mailing list.  There were also very
> few tests related to null handling, and numerous bugs.  Despite the
> provider clearly handling nulls incorrectly, there has been no action
> on these issues.
> NH-2370
> NH-2398
> NH-2402
> Again, there is a full patch with extended tests in NH-2402, but not
> even a single comment on this important issue.  If NH goes to release
> without resolving NH-2402, it will cause breaking changes in the
> future.
>
> There are many Linq issues with patches and tests.  I'll just name
> NH-2403 since I submitted it.  Again, there has been no attention.
>
> Maybe I'm annoying, but I do find it quite frustrating when about the
> only thing that's progressing is the version number and the same bugs
> and limitations are still present.  I've been happily using NHibernate
> for years, but it truly is disheartening when even serious / popular
> issues with full code and tests aren't addressed in any way.
>
>         Patrick Earl

Reply via email to