You have create a JIRA ticket and we have to create the mapping for Order,
the lines to store a Customer with orders, then we have to implement the
test.
After do it we can spent time to fix the issue.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Ricardo Peres <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, Fabio, you are right: setting the class to lazy fixed the
> problem.
> I created an issue in JIRA: Lazy Properties Causing An Exception If
> Containing Class Is Set To Not Lazy, NH-2632.
>
> RP
>
>
> On Apr 7, 5:30 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Perhaps is because the entity itself is lazy-false.
> > We have no test for this case.
> > Please file a new JIRA ticket.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Please use our JIRA and attach the test case.
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ricardo Peres <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >> Hello again!
> >
> > >> Here's the code:
> >
> > >> ModelMapper mapper = new ModelMapper();
> >
> > >> mapper.Class<Customer>(ca =>
> > >> {
> > >>        ca.Table("`CUSTOMER`");
> > >>        ca.Lazy(false);
> > >>        ca.Id(x => x.Id, map =>
> > >>        {
> > >>                map.Column("`ID`");
> > >>                map.Generator(new HiLoWithSuffixIdGenerator(), g =>
> > >> g.Params(new
> > >> { max_lo = "1000" }));
> > >>        });
> > >>        ca.NaturalId(x => x.Property(c => c.Name));
> > >>        ca.Property(x => x.Name, p =>
> > >>        {
> > >>                p.NotNullable(true);
> > >>                p.Column("`NAME`");
> > >>        });
> > >>        ca.Property(x => x.Address, p =>
> > >>        {
> > >>                p.NotNullable(false);
> > >>                p.Lazy(true);
> > >>                p.Column("`ADDRESS`");
> > >>        });
> > >>        ca.Set(c => c.Orders, c =>
> > >>        {
> > >>                c.Key(x => x.Column("`CUSTOMERID`"));
> > >>                c.Lazy(CollectionLazy.Lazy);
> > >>                c.Inverse(true);
> > >>                c.Cascade(Cascade.All);
> > >>        }, c => c.OneToMany());
> > >> });
> >
> > >> public class Customer
> > >> {
> > >>        public virtual Int64 Id
> > >>        {
> > >>                get;
> > >>                private set;
> > >>        }
> >
> > >>        public virtual String Name
> > >>        {
> > >>                get;
> > >>                set;
> > >>        }
> >
> > >>        public virtual String Address
> > >>        {
> > >>                get;
> > >>                set;
> > >>        }
> >
> > >>        public virtual IEnumerable<Order> Orders
> > >>        {
> > >>                get;
> > >>                private set;
> > >>        }
> > >> }
> >
> > >> Class Order is mapped similarly, everything is working fine. Now, if I
> > >> do a:
> >
> > >> Customer cust = session.Get<Customer>(1000L);
> >
> > >> I get a class cast exception saying that it cannot convert an Object
> > >> into a String in Customer. If I comment out the p.Lazy(true) line on
> > >> the Address property mapping, it works fine. BTW, I also tried it with
> > >> HBM.XML, and I got the same exception.
> >
> > >> Thanks,
> >
> > >> RP
> >
> > >> On Apr 7, 5:16 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > I have checked our tests and we have a specific test using
> > >> > string NHibernate.Test.LazyProperty and it work.
> > >> > Which is your problem ?
> >
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > No one of both
> >
> > >> > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Ricardo Peres <[email protected]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > >> > >> Hi,
> >
> > >> > >> It seems that NH 3.2 (trunk version) no longer supports lazy
> > >> > >> properties of String type. At least, I'm having trouble with it:
> when
> > >> > >> querying, I get an exception complaining about the property type.
> > >> > >> Is this a known problem, or a new decision?
> >
> > >> > >> Thanks!
> >
> > >> > >> RP
> >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Fabio Maulo
> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Fabio Maulo
> >
> > > --
> > > Fabio Maulo
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
>



-- 
Fabio Maulo

Reply via email to