Something like you showed, but for HQL: the possibility to add custom server-specific functions that can be used in HQL, without the need to subclass xxxDialect. Does it make sense?
On Apr 20, 6:34 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > which is your proposal ? > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ricardo Peres <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > Some time ago, Fabio posted about LINQ provider extensibility in > > NHibernate: > >http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/07/nhibernate-linq-provider-exten... > > . > > It is such a nice feature that I was wondering if it would make sense > > to have something like that for HQL (yes, I still use HQL...). I know > > that we can subclass a dialect and add custom functions, but it > > requires duplicating code for all possible dialects that we are going > > to use. > > What are your thoughts? > > > Thanks, > > > RP > > -- > Fabio Maulo
