I mean, I don't see any reason not to have...
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Patrick Earl <[email protected]> wrote: > I would propose that only the most obvious methods be placed into the > shared interface initially. People could propose the addition of > other methods after significant thought in the future. Certainly > though, there are many typical query methods that would be safe to > share. If there are significant semantic differences in methods with > the same signature, then just don't share them now. I don't > personally see any reason to have such a base interface. Although > ISessionImplementor is a common interface, it's not intended to be the > public face of the API, and having a public shared face is obviously > useful (or people wouldn't be requesting it repeatedly). > > Patrick Earl >
