Hmm... interesting, haven't used Single before. That allows me to get rid of a line of code. Thanks for that.
However, it still does not fix the underlying issue. / Michael / On May 31, 4:41 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not the same thing. I need to know that there is one, and exactly one, > > result. > > So: Single() > or SingleOrDefault() if you allow no-results. > -- > Fabio Maulo
