I suspect the short answer is 'no, you can't do this'.

There doesn't appear to be another overload of the Set method that would 
allow a mapping where no class field/property exists.The name of the string 
parameter - the one Fabio refers to - is 'notVisiblePropertyOrFieldName'. 
You are passing it the value of "LastWeekOrders"  which is not an actual 
field/property on the class you are mapping - hence the MappingException.

I personally like to keep query/filter semantics out of mappings. Queries 
should be used for querying.

Reply via email to