To evaluate what ? for example how many commits comes from users outside the core team ? http://www.ohloh.net/p/hibernate/contributors?page=1
to then compare it with NH core team ? http://www.ohloh.net/p/nhibernate/contributors?page=1 or, perhaps, to verify that they have currently 21 open pull-requests and 0 closed ? (that mean that they have had 21 pull-requests since they are in git-hub) https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-core/pulls Perhaps could be better if the NHibernate team uses its own criteria to move sources On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]>wrote: > The Hibernate (Java) project is hosted by GitHub. Maybe that's a good > (albeit vague) reason to go there, or at least they could be the ones to ask > for opinions. > > /G > > > 2011/8/4 Richard Brown (gmail) <[email protected]> > > >> I’m truly ambivalent about git vs. hg, and github vs. bitbucket (if SVN >> was super-fast and entirely disconnected, I’d keep it in a heartbeat.) >> However, I suspect that given the (very) limited committer resources we >> have, I think our single biggest deciding factor when choosing a DVCS hub is >> going to be choosing the one that provides the best contribution from the >> community. (Note, by ‘best’ I mean quality over quantity ... quality >> patches are rare.) >> >> Unfortunately I don’t think there’s any way you can ‘prove’ which of these >> is the beast choice in advance of the decision ... I think we just need to >> rely on anecdotal evidence from people who have used both as to how many >> (high quality) contributions are received on each; github appears to win on >> this point. >> >> >> -- Fabio Maulo
