On 18.08.2011 13:33, Stephen Bohlen wrote:
That's actually a really good suggestion (commit a broad delete op to
the SVN repo along with something like my suggested txt file); I'd not
considered that approach. This way, anyone blindly updating their copy
of the trunk wouldn't even get any actual code but would be left with
just the txt file, making it impossible (hopefully!) for them to not
notice that *something* changed.
I agree tags + branches should remain in SVN as-is since those are
probably supposed to be considered stable/unchanging.
What do others think of this approach?
+1.
D.
