after use parallel On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>wrote:
> I see a couple ways to benefit from .NET 4.5: > - Targeting the Portable Class Library > - Taking advantage of (and exposing) async methods > > Both require considerable effort. > > The latter can result in interesting improvements. Consider: > var results = await session.CreateQuery(...).List<Foo>(); > Internally, this could use async ADO.NET methods, so a good part of the > processing would not hold a thread. > > Diego > > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 01:14, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That mean just: "wait some more months after you have waited one year". >> btw, >> which are the specific features of .NET4.5 you are thinking about and how >> they may benefit NH ? >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Julian Maughan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Another option to consider is skipping .NET 4, and going straight to >>> 4.5? >>> >>> On Sunday, 22 April 2012 04:10:13 UTC+8, Fabio Maulo wrote: >>>> >>>> In general after a release we have some other 2 or 3 minor releases >>>> (for some reason was not the case for 3.2.0). >>>> For vNext I'm strongly oriented to make another "big" breaking >>>> change... NH4.0.0 .NET4 with bye bye to Iesi.Collection, drop of some >>>> custom threadsafe collection to use those implemented in .NET4 ... >>>> NH4.1.0 drop of IDictionary for dynamic object and the usage of .NET4 >>>> dynamic , >>>> NH4.2.0 the usage of parallel to hydrate collections after queries. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Oskar Berggren < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So what do we do now that NH 3.3.0GA is released? >>>>> >>>>> There are already several interesting pull requests lined up, some of >>>>> which are new features. I propose that the next planned version will >>>>> be 3.4.0. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What about possible as yet undetected regressions in NH 3.3.0GA? Do >>>>> you think it would be a good idea to hold of merging to the master >>>>> branch for a week or so in case any important regressions pops up and >>>>> we want to do a 3.3.1? One can do this from a branch of course, but >>>>> without the assistance of the excellent build server. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> /Oskar >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fabio Maulo >>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Fabio Maulo >> >> > -- Fabio Maulo
