Bit of a problem with hanging tests that made me stumble on the finish
line. Anyway, I've merged a few things today, and cleared out the remaining
tasks from Jira by moving them to 5.0.

Waiting for PR 513 and 531 to build/test so we can merge those, then I'll
make a new attempt at releasing 4.1CR1 - unless someone beats me to it,
it's going to be at least 12 hours until I'll get back to this.

/Oskar



2016-11-19 23:32 GMT+00:00 Oskar Berggren <[email protected]>:

> I'll look into putting out rc1 Sunday evening (UTC).
>
> 2016-11-16 6:06 GMT+00:00 Alexander Zaytsev <[email protected]>:
>
>> I think we shall release 4.1 release candidate immediately. However there
>> are some pull requests which are worth merging prior 4.1.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Alexander
>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 at 6:04 AM, Oskar Berggren <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there anything preventing us from doing a 4.1 release candidate
>>> immediately?
>>>
>>>
>>> Going forward, I wonder if we should switch to a more flexible approach
>>> regarding releases. I sort of like what the GTK project did recently,
>>> namely that the first set of minor releases in each major release would NOT
>>> promise API stability.
>>>
>>> In NH terms this could mean that:
>>>
>>> NH 4.0.x releases with no API changes.
>>>
>>> NH 4.1.x contains API additions but no API breaks (same as current
>>> scheme)
>>>
>>> NH 5.0 may (and will) contain API breakage.
>>>
>>> NH 5.1 may also break API
>>>
>>> NH 5.2 may also break API
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> NH 5.something will eventually be declared new API stable version. Most
>>> likely NH6 branch will open immediately as the new non API-stable branch.
>>>
>>> NH 5.something+1 must be API compatible with previous version.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The benefit of this would be that API-breaking patches can more quickly
>>> be accepted into a release, without waiting in the sidelines for a year or
>>> two. User's can either elect to use the latest version, in which case they
>>> must be prepared to handle API changes more frequently, or stay on an
>>> API-stable branch until the next API-stable branch is declared.
>>>
>>>
>>> This would no longer be strict "semantic versioning", but I'm not sure
>>> we should care too much about that.
>>>
>>>
>>> /Oskar
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "nhibernate-development" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "nhibernate-development" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhibernate-development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to