Finally figured this one out. The problem is that the entity names had
a dot ('.') in them, this causes NHibernate to look through the
persisters for the entity class mapping, and it ends up using them
both (in SessionFactoryImpl.GetImplementors)In case anyone else is mapping the same class twice, make sure not to use dots in your entity names. On Feb 26, 8:32 pm, Robert Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > I may have spoken too soon, it seems that both queries are still > issued for the entity specific mapping. > > On Feb 26, 7:07 pm, Robert Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nevermind, this is fixed in the latest revision > > > On Feb 26, 5:51 pm, Robert Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Running into a problem with entity name, so I just want to be sure I'm > > > getting it :) > > > > I have a single entity class with two separate nhibernate mappings, > > > one with an entity-name set, and the other with none (that is, entity- > > > name is not specified). If I attempt to list the entities using the > > > specific entity name, it gives me the results from both mappings. That > > > is: > > > > session.CreateCriteria("my specific entity name").List() > > > > Will give me twice as many results as normal. Looking at the logs, I > > > can see that it is executing 2 separate queries, one for the "my > > > specific entity name" and another for the 'default' mapping for the > > > entity class in question. > > > > Is this by design? > > > > On Feb 18, 5:16 am, Robert Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks, fluent mapping solves a few other things I had with managing > > > > common mapping elements etc > > > > > On Feb 12, 1:34 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > You can use Fluent-NH until we don't implement "embedded- > > > > > Loquacious-mapping-configuration". > > > > > > 2009/2/12 Robert Byrne <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Schema action will be quite useful actually, for avoiding creating > > > > > > the > > > > > > view mapped tables when unit testing with sqlite etc. > > > > > > > Yes thats the idea I have in mind (entity name), using the current > > > > > > trunk revision. > > > > > > > Is there an easy way to 'clone' the mappings of the first entity? > > > > > > That > > > > > > is, I have one entity that is defined by the .hbm.xml (mapped to the > > > > > > dbo/view schema), and I want to start with a copy of that mapping, > > > > > > then add the additional property and set the schema name for the > > > > > > second mapping. Or will I have to build up the 'clone' manually, by > > > > > > deep copying over all the metadata from the first mapping? > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 3:46 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > If you are thinking in entity-name it is because you are using the > > > > > > trunk.To > > > > > > > map a view now you can use the new tag > > > > > > > schema-action="none|drop|export|update|validate|all" > > > > > > > > To map two different entities (they have different properties; one > > > > > > > difference is enough) you can use the tag "schema" > > > > > > > > 2009/2/11 Robert Byrne <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for feedback on the best way to do the following: > > > > > > > > > Map a class to a view in sql server (its in the 'dbo' schema) > > > > > > > > and map > > > > > > > > the same class to the table which backs up that view (its in a > > > > > > > > separate database schema, 'tableschema'). > > > > > > > > > The table has an additional column that the view doesn't have, > > > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > from that they are identical. > > > > > > > > > I'm currently thinking that the way to do this is to use the > > > > > > > > entity- > > > > > > > > name feature to create a duplicate mapping for the 'tableschema' > > > > > > > > entities. I can loop over the metadata before the session > > > > > > > > factory is > > > > > > > > built, clone the metadata and make the changes - set the > > > > > > > > database > > > > > > > > schema and add the additional property mapping. > > > > > > > > > Does this make sense? Is there a better way? Most importantly, > > > > > > > > is it > > > > > > > > possible. > > > > > > > > > Also, any advice on the best way to clone the metadata for a > > > > > > > > class? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Rob. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Fabio Maulo > > > > > > -- > > > > > Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
