Hi, Background: We have 1600 objects to be loaded in the session factory, thus impacting the memory footprint of the application. In the endeavor to reduce the memory footprint we are loading the objects dynamically where we are destroying the existing session factory and recreating one every time. The ISession.SessionFactory is a read only property, however since we are recreating the configuration and the session factory we intend to add a setter to this property such that the session factory created can directly be assigned to the ISession.SessionFactory.
Questions: 1. Is the above change to NH a valid change. 2. What is the procedure to follow such that the above change can be published. - I am aware that NH is under LGPL license, and we wish to distribute the changes as part of our deployment. We do understand that by the above change we would be compromising on the object lifetime, however given the constraint that we cannot ask our customers to either scale up or scale out, we are running out of options. These changes are intended to be short-lived, where the customers can be asked to increase the budgets to either scale up or scale out at a later point in time. Your response is highly awaited. Regards, --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
