What is an alternative to this implementation?! So I would say that in the correct sense of lazy loading that you have one ISession which is always present!
Right?! On 8 Jul., 16:52, Oskar Berggren <[email protected]> wrote: > Because if you open and close the session in > SomeRepository.FindSmthBySmth(...) you will not benefit from lazy > loading, database transactions or session cache. These were just some > quick reason that came to mind. > > /Oskar > > 2009/7/8 Dotan N. <[email protected]>: > > > Hi all, > > > I remember reading a post from Ayende that stated that if he sees code where > > someone opened session inside each persister method, he doesn't know how to > > use NH. > > So after implementing various method to manage Session myself, and i've > > steered clear of what Ayende recommended not to do, i've now exposed my self > > to linq2sql and > > i couldn't see any special considerations to handle its form of session > > there. > > > So what is wrong with opening session in repository? > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
