i agree... just wanted to know how it can be done

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:

> possible is possible but take care about what mean INHERITANCE in OOP.
>
>           Animal
>            /    \
>        Cat    Dog
>
> Cat is a Animal
> Dog is a Animal
> Cat is not a Dog and never will be a Dog
> Dog is not a Cat and never will be a Cat
> Cat and Dog are different Types of Animal
>
> A PoorGuy can will be a RichGuy and a RichGuy can will be a PoorGuy: Poor
> and Rich are not different Type of Guy instead it is a state.
>
> The same is for Employee... in this case more than a state we can talk
> about a role (may be).
>
> 2010/4/2 nadav s <[email protected]>
>
>> lets say i have Employee which is a concrete class with the properties
>> Id
>> Type
>>
>> and i have CoolEmployee and MoronEmployee that extend Employee
>>
>> now i have many employee types and i want type=1 to generate CoolEmployee
>> and type=2 to generate MoronEmployee.
>> there are alot of other possible values, for instance, 3 is manager and 4
>> is Cleaning guy, and i want all of these other values to generate the
>> Employee class
>>
>> Do i need an extra column to discriminate between the classes or can i
>> somehow say that Employee is the default class of a not-found value and use
>> the type column?
>>
>> (i don't have a mapping because it is just a theoritical question :) )
>>
>> btw, another thing i was wondering about but couldn't google an answer is
>> if it is currently possible to set range of values for discrimination
>> (similar to the previous question)
>> lets say that i have the sub classes RichGuy, PoorGuy both extend Guy
>> and i wanna have the RichGuy subclass generated when the Income column is
>> more than 1,000,000
>> if the Income is between  10,000 to 1,000,000 its just a Guy
>> and less than 10,000 is a PoorGuy
>>
>> could this be mapped?
>> i see a big problem with this scenario because if the Income property is
>> updatebly by the application, we could have a PoorGuy that his Income just
>> became
>> high enough that he should become just a Guy
>> but if the Income property isn't updatebly it might make sense
>>
>> again, it is just a theoretical question.
>>
>> thanks.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "nhusers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to