Can you please respond to the guy with small sample of what code would look like? I thought putting the issue here will be more helpful to get the resolution to the guy as the issue looked very interesting to me (actually thought it may be something that already behaved better in current trunk or something).
-- *Mohamed Meligy* Senior Developer, Microsoft Technologies - Technical Delivery Group Injazat Data Systems P.O. Box: 8230, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E. (*GMT+4*)** Direct: +971 2 4045385 Mobile: +971 50 2623624, +971 55 2017 621 Email: [email protected] Weblog: *http://gurustop.net* On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Dmitry Starosta <[email protected]>wrote: > I noticed this issue too when working on a project. I resolved it by > using sortable instead of orderable collections. The problem here is > HQL queries behave differently and in a more predictable manner. > > On Jul 13, 5:04 am, [email protected] wrote: > > > > The SQL issued by NH is 100% compliant to your request. > > > > Fred. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
