>>since there aren't great alternatives. That's a really salient point -- there really *isn't* another OSS entry in the .NET free-text search space that one could just switch over to even *if* you wanted to make the change to it instead of remaining with Lucene.NET. In the .NET OSS space, Lucene.NET is sort of one-of-a-kind (at least AFAIK -- perhaps there is something else out there and I'm simply not aware of it, of course).
-Steve B. On Nov 2, 6:40 pm, Rory Plaire <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Steve. > > I recently committed to using NHSearch on a project, and don't want to see > it sink, since there aren't great alternatives. > > Heading over to the Lucene.Net dev list... > > -r > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:01 AM, sbohlen <[email protected]> wrote: > > are interested in getting involved, etc. to participate in > > Lucene.NET's future viability, etc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
