Hi Jason,

Appologies for the delay,

Here's my configuration:

<hibernate-configuration xmlns="urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2">
  <session-factory>
    <property
name="connection.provider">NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider</
property>
    <property name="dialect">NHibernate.Dialect.Oracle10gDialect</
property>
    <property
name="connection.driver_class">NHibernate.Driver.OracleDataClientDriver</
property>
    <property
name="connection.connection_string_name">ConnectionString.Oracle
(ODP.NET)</property>
    <property
name="proxyfactory.factory_class">NHibernate.ByteCode.LinFu.ProxyFactoryFactory,
NHibernate.ByteCode.LinFu</property>
    <property name="show_sql">false</property>
    <property name="query.substitutions">true=1;false=0</property>
    <mapping  assembly="MyEnterprise.Model" />
  </session-factory>
</hibernate-configuration>

I'm using the ODP assembly (Oracle.DataAccess) version: 2.11.2.1.0

Best regards
Rodrigo

On 4 dic, 22:00, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Connection leaking happened in my case(wcf environment), when a
> unhanlded exception was thrown and the session never got disposed.
> I've not seen any other side effects, besides that you need to
> configure the connection release mode to on_close since distributed
> transaction can commit on a different thread, and you must make sure
> the session is still available. If you read the comments on davy's
> blog post, you will find the pattern I use.
>
> Like Fabio said, the distributed txn factory is used by default, so no
> configuration changes shoul be needed. My recommendation is that you
> check the version of odp.net you are running, and check the connection
> string documentation for oracle since I think there is a Parm that
> might need to be turned on. With dist. Txn, if you want to rollback,
> either throw an exception or call the transactionscope.dispose(). Also
> cover all your bases, check that meets is running and check the
> statistics to make sure txns are being generated
>
> On Dec 3, 3:30 pm, rodri_ogri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > B.T.W, I have previously saw an issue regarding to leaking connections
> > on this 
> > site:http://davybrion.com/blog/2010/05/avoiding-leaking-connections-with-n...
>
> > The autor states that is order to avoid the leak when using
> > transactionScope (which is my case) the transactionscope instance
> > should be surrounding a NH Transaction, otherwise it will consume the
> > connection pool. Now, I'm not sure if that recomendation is the best
> > practice, but I find it interesting to comment if that brings any
> > solution to this issue,
>
> > best regards.
>
> > Rodrigo
>
> > On 3 dic, 10:00, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I don't think it is related to Oracle. We've been using distributed
> > > transaction with NH and no issues. Part of your problem seems to be
> > > that you are trying to start up an ADO.NET/NH transaction inside the
> > > TransactionScope, this is not needed. Once in a transaction scope, NH
> > > is smart enough to pick this up, and every sql statement will be
> > > withing the distributed transaction. You will see some weird messages
> > > in the log, about a transaction present set to null or something like
> > > that, you can ignore those with an Oracle DB
>
> > > On Dec 2, 5:18 pm, rodri_ogri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I forgot to paste the message :P,
>
> > > > "[NHibernate.TransactionException]{"Begin failed with SQL exception"}
> > > > The connection is already part of a local or distributed transaction"
>
> > > > Is it a Oracle related issue?
>
> > > > best regards
>
> > > > On 2 dic, 12:31, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > A stack trace without the exception message is more than enough.
> > > > > Thanks.
>
> > > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:54 PM, rodri_ogri <[email protected]> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
>
> > > > > > I have tried something I thought was fixed on this version, it is 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > capability to work with TransactionScope and NH transactions with an
> > > > > > Oracle 11G DB.
>
> > > > > > This is the test I have done:
>
> > > > > > [TestMethod]
> > > > > >        public void TransactionScope_Test()
> > > > > >        {
> > > > > >            bool vTransactionInitialized = false;
>
> > > > > >            using(TransactionScope vTx = new
> > > > > > TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required))
> > > > > >            {
> > > > > >                using (ISession vSession =
> > > > > > SessionFactory.OpenSession())
> > > > > >                {
> > > > > >                    using(ITransaction vNHTransaction =
> > > > > > vSession.BeginTransaction())
> > > > > >                    {
> > > > > >                        try
> > > > > >                            {
> > > > > >                            vTransactionInitialized = true;
> > > > > >                            vNHTransaction.Commit();
> > > > > >                            }
> > > > > >                            catch (Exception)
> > > > > >                            {
> > > > > >                            vNHTransaction.Rollback();
> > > > > >                            }
> > > > > >                    }
> > > > > >                }
> > > > > >                vTx.Complete();
> > > > > >            }
>
> > > > > >            Assert.IsTrue(vTransactionInitialized);
> > > > > >        }
>
> > > > > > It throws a NHibernate.TransactionException with the following 
> > > > > > trace:
>
> > > > > > Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection.BeginTransaction(IsolationLevel
> > > > > > isolationLevel)
> > > > > > Oracle.DataAccess.Client.OracleConnection.BeginDbTransaction(IsolationLevel
> > > > > > isolationLevel)
>
> > > > > > System.Data.Common.DbConnection.System.Data.IDbConnection.BeginTransaction(
> > > > > >  )
> > > > > > NHibernate.Transaction.AdoTransaction.Begin(IsolationLevel
> > > > > > isolationLevel) in 
> > > > > > d:\CSharp\NH\nhibernate\src\NHibernate\Transaction
> > > > > > \AdoTransaction.cs: line 130
> > > > > > NHibernate.Transaction.AdoTransaction.Begin(IsolationLevel
> > > > > > isolationLevel) in 
> > > > > > d:\CSharp\NH\nhibernate\src\NHibernate\Transaction
> > > > > > \AdoTransaction.cs: line 145
> > > > > > NHibernate.Transaction.AdoTransaction.Begin() in d:\CSharp\NH
> > > > > > \nhibernate\src\NHibernate\Transaction\AdoTransaction.cs: line 94
> > > > > > NHibernate.AdoNet.ConnectionManager.BeginTransaction() in 
> > > > > > d:\CSharp\NH
> > > > > > \nhibernate\src\NHibernate\AdoNet\ConnectionManager.cs: line 324
> > > > > > NHibernate.Impl.SessionImpl.BeginTransaction() in d:\CSharp\NH
> > > > > > \nhibernate\src\NHibernate\Impl\SessionImpl.cs: line 1437
>
> > > > > > Is it possible to have it fixed on this new version?
>
> > > > > > best regards
>
> > > > > > Rodrigo
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > "nhusers" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]
> > > > > >  >
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Fabio Maulo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to