I think the field must be protected, not private, so that subclasses (proxies) can access it.
On Sep 6, 2:08 pm, kriebb <[email protected]> wrote: > bug posted... ? unless someone else got an > idea?https://nhibernate.jira.com/browse/NH-2873 > > On Sep 6, 11:02 am, kriebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think I'm missing something, I hope someone can take the time to > > explain. > > > Again, I've taken a lot of time searching, but I cannot find a > > solution: > > > Take the following mapping and imangine that the OrderInitiator class > > has a Code property. > > > <class name="Pdc.Erp.Domain.OrderManagement.AbstractOrder" > > table="GeneralOrder" abstract="true" > > > ... > > <component name="OrderInitiator" access="nosetter.camelcase" > > class="Pdc.Erp.Domain.OrderManagement.Components.Order.OrderInitiator" > > > </component > > </class> > > > In the AbstractOrder.cs i have the following: > > > protected OrderInitiator orderInitiator; > > > public virtual OrderInitiator OrderInitiator {get { return > > orderInitiator = orderInitiator ?? new OrderInitiator()} > > set{orderInitiator = value;} > > > If I want to access the OrderInitiator Property, the field is being > > filled up ok as NH3.2.0 should do, but when I access the > > OrderInitiator property with code 20, it gives me the new > > OrderIntiator() with a null code. > > > My guess is that something is happening with the proxy, it override > > the virtual property and does not know that it should return the > > backend field...., but I defined it with access="nosetter.camelcase". > > > It makes no difference if I put the acces="field". > > > Does someone know what I'm doing wrong or does it seems like a bug and > > post it to Jira? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
