Which was the problem with many-to-many ? ConfORM does not have a convention about many-to-many just because, after analyze some prjs, I have realized that it does not exists. Even in presence of a bidirectional collection you can be sure that the relation is a many-to-many; in ConfORM you have to declare it explicitly in the ObjectRelationalMapper: orm.ManyToMany<User,Role>();
http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/03/conform-mapping-many-to-many.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/ibzLxUDDAC8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
