But are updates to the <join>ed properties persisted?

On Thursday, March 15, 2012 9:34:42 AM UTC, Oskar Berggren wrote:
>
> The sum it up, the problem is that you have a many-to-many relation on
> one side, but want it to be a one-to-many on another side.
>
> Using the <join> element to treat CompanyToDocument and Document as
> both being part of the Document entity sounds like a way forward.
>
> /Oskar
>
>
> 2012/3/14 jksoft <[email protected]>:
> > First off, I am relatively new to NHibernate and so far finding good
> > documentation has been a trial.
> >
> > I am in the processing of using NH to connect to a legacy application 
> which
> > also includes some new tables we are adding for this project.  The 
> database
> > makes extensive use of join tables to link two entities together.  An
> > example would be
> >
> > Company --> CompanyToDocument <-- Document
> > CompanyToDocument
> > - companyId
> > - documentId
> >
> > While this is a traditional way of doing Many to Many relationships, it
> > really is a One to Many as each Document can only be associated with one
> > Company.
> >
> > I have been racking my brain trying to figure out how to model this in 
> the
> > application and use NH to map appropriately.  I really want my Document
> > class to either have a "companyId" property or a Company property, not a
> > collection of Companies which is the natural mapping for a Many to Many.
> >
> > One idea I came up with was to put both a Company and a Companies 
> property
> > on my Document class so the NH Many to Many association would work.  The
> > problem with this is I still can't do a query using my companyId property
> > since NH doesn't know anything about it.  One thought I had is to use a 
> Join
> > association to map the companyId property.  I suppose another thought 
> would
> > be to tweak the query to join back to the Join table.
> >
> > I wanted to seek out some advice as the pieces just don't seem to be 
> fitting
> > in place which makes me think I must be doing something wrong here.
> >
> > I am open to any and all ideas here as I am stumped on this.
> >
> > Thanks for any advice,
> >
> > J
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "nhusers" group.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/x8eTnz-LzOUJ.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/I_P3iM0rrCkJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to