I get a great answer on the Stack Overflow page. Thank you.
El sábado, 28 de abril de 2012 09:10:21 UTC-4:30, Jesus Bracamonte escribió: > > Using the table per concrete class strategy, I have found that the parent > collections are *not* associated with the subclasses, I explain dipper my > problem and put an example in > This<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10319589/nhibernate-constraints-associations-of-a-parent-class-are-dropped-on-the-subclas> > Stack Overflow question. > > But here is a quick example of the problem > > classes: > > class A{ > ISet<foo> foos; > } > > class B: A { > > } > > Mappings: > > <class name="A"> > <Set name="foos" inversed="true"> > <key column="fooId"/> > <one-to-many class="foo"> > <Set> > </class> > > <union-subclass name="B" extends="A"> > > </union-subclass> > > Any advice or help that you can provide me will be much appreciated. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/nij3AU7Nf14J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
