Hi Alex, I would prefer the fallback option. An option that has been explicit declared cannot be ignored. This would cause misunderstandings. And the second will cause loss of functionality, so that the ROWNUM can not be used anymore? If I understand correctly. Good work! Best regards, David
Am Dienstag, 6. August 2013 00:54:40 UTC+2 schrieb Alexander I. Zaytsev: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Alexander I. Zaytsev <haz...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > Date: 2013/7/15 > Subject: Oracle 12c Dialect > To: nhibernate-...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > > Hi guys, > > I'm planning to add dialect for Oracle 12c. > > The new features affecting the dialect would be: > > - support identity columns > - support new paging syntax with OFFSET / FETCH keywords. > > The problem with new limit syntax that it does not support "FOR UPDATE" > with it. So what do you prefer of following? > > - fallback to previous version of paging using rownum. > - throw exception that "for update" and paging can not work together > - ignore "for update" clasue in case of paging > > Best Regards, > Alex > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
