I agree, Graham On May 18, 2014, at 6:43 AM, Allen Thomas wrote:
> I'd go with the 83 personally. While there are some with 200,000 miles out > there, I would be looking to do a full tear down around 100,000 miles. The > older bike may need more work initially but would probably be more reliable > down the road. > > Allen Thomas > > On May 17, 2014 7:36 PM, "Laura Hannam" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have two bikes I've been looking at > > 1992 Nighthawk with 84,000 miles on it or a 1983 Nighthawk with 14,000 miles > on it. > > Both run great - no problems, clean titles. > > Is is bad to have that many miles on a bike? They're within a hundred dollars > in price of each other. > > What should I do????? > > Any input is greatly appreciated!! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
