Thanks, I can do that. In previous versions I actually called the operator `?.`, but I moved away from it because of its low precedence. It does mean that users of the library will need to use extra parentheses in some places. For example, expressions such as `if a =? b.?c:` would become `if a=? (b.?c):`.
- dot-like operations and calls markspanbroek
- dot-like operations and calls PMunch
- dot-like operations and calls Araq
- dot-like operations and calls markspanbroek
- dot-like operations and calls markspanbroek
- dot-like operations and calls Hlaaftana
- dot-like operations and calls markspanbroek
- dot-like operations and calls dwin
- dot-like operations and calls markspanbroek