> considering how much Nim offers, the existing documentation, especially the > official one, is absolutely ridiculously minuscule > > If Nim would have at least a hundred times (...) the amount of higher quality > documentation, I guarantee, that the user base of this language would > skyrocket, compared to how it's going, now. > > Look up any significant Nim project & you will see a developer, who is either > closely related to the Nim team, a compiler contributer in some way and/or a > C OTP since at least two decades, straight. Anyone can do stuff in Nim, but > if you really want to accomplish something juicy the Nim way, for example > with the FFI, macros, etc. you have to be truly deep into Nim to get the > whole picture, even more so the pile of undocumented quirks, > "bugs"/"features" & other noteworthy factors.
Sorry to repeat your words, but waouh! It's just like you reading in my mind ! That's all what I'm trying to say since the beginning. @Araq, why not give a try to a new documentation project ? What will it cost ? Why is it so hard to break to status quo ? We all want Nim to progress right ??
