I "liked" his post, because it seemed like an objective assessment that aligns with my assessment. I'm here because I love the language, want to see it win, and wanted to understand what it would take to drive more adoption, especially since, as someone else mentioned, there does seem to be some selection bias here around the adequacy of the docs, in terms of driving adoption.
IN THIS THREAD I've already been compared to a chatbot. The thread I was originally going to weigh in on got locked, and the comments there, to me, read as hostile to people wanting more docs. Some people have had some decent suggestions just on docs, but nobody from the Nim team is saying, "here's how we'd support something official like that". And certainly nobody seems to want to engage on the questions I've asked: 1. Is driving more adoption of Nim a meaningful goal? 2. If so, what are the biggest hurdles? 3. Is there a way to overcome them? I'm going to shut up about it all now, unless someone actually wants to have a real discussion about what can improve adoption. "Write docs" doesn't address the issue I raised, but as I said, if there's some sort of sanctioned Wiki, I probably will, despite the fact that I certainly don't feel welcome.
