> Fair enough but your point felt like "and now not even C++ wrappers are good > enough".
Well then I'm glad I rephrased it, because that was not my intention at all. Nim's ability to interoperate with C and C++, amongst others, is excellent, and a selling point of Nim. Just not so much in this specific case, IMO. If you're writing a wrapper for say, a tested cryptography library, that makes perfect sense to me to bind to a C one and just use it in Nim, and not wait for a Nim version.
