@LeuGim - thanks for the clarification @mratsim I didn't know about SomeReal thanks for pointing that out.
> By the way, I don't really understand your need but you can usually go very > far in Nim with just generics and overloading without to implement class-like > types. > > If you need runtime polymorphism, don't forget to look into object variants > and methods (which are dispatched at runtime instead of compile-time). I did look at object variants which are very interesting. In the end I think I'll probably end up writing using compile time parametric polymorphism with generics - but at the moment, I'm kind of feeling my way around the language to see what I can do with it. I'm now getting round to playing with generics. My experience of meta-programming comes mostly from D, Julia and even less C++, I have read type parameters, templates, and macros section in the manual and it certainly looks very flexible - I'll definitely have questions about it later. Many thanks
